Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ashlyn Krueger vs Tatjana Maria Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Maria analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashlyn Krueger vs Tatjana Maria Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Maria
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 43.7% of points on their second serve, while Maria has won 43.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 57.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maria has won 53.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.97% and 37.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 57.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maria has saved 45.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 57.38% of matches played (W/L 35/ 26), with Maria winning 50% (W/L 32/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Maria has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 63/ 32), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 196/ 193).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10), where as Maria has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times and Maria being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Maria winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Maria was at the Veneto Open - Gaiba, 25-06-2023, Final, Grass with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory 3-6 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Maria have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 1 times and Maria 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Maria 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.05 while Maria has played against players with an average rank of 170.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maria has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 40.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maria has converted 47.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
66
Rank
65
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
65
Rank
42
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (120-89)
Career Total W/L
56% (616-485)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
43% (12-16)
$431,120
Career Prize Money
$2,333,842
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Tatjana Maria |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:46 | 1:57:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (53/89) | 57% (51/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (38/53) | 73% (37/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (18/36) | 46% (18/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (35/90) | 37% (33/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Tatjana Maria
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Tatjana Maria |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 43% (12/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (34/32) | 42% (28/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (316/294) | 46% (273/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 43% (6/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 82 | 92 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:17 | 1:44:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 135.37 | 157.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1245/1927) | 55% (1068/1939) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (812/1245) | 62% (660/1068) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (298/682) | 44% (381/871) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (109/268) | 48% (102/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (936/2064) | 43% (829/1926) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 40% (4/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (6/6) | 46% (6/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 41% (11/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (17/12) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (17/5) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 19% (16/3) |
Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
63%
(
83 of
131)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
0
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
6
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
46%
(
60 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
120
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Vera Zvonareva
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Sofia Kenin
54%
(
67 of
124)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
7
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
12
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
33%
(
19 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
51%
(
63 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Martha Matoula
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
90%
(
19 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tatjana Maria Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Tatjana Maria
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Tatjana Maria
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Tatjana Maria
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
47 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Tatjana Maria
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Peyton Stearns
58%
(
66 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
114)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Tatjana Maria
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Laura Pigossi
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
75 of
100)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Tatjana Maria
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Julia Riera
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Maria Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
